logo

Independent Evaluation Office

  • About IEO
    • Mandate
    • Director's Desk
    • Board Decisions
    • Annual Report on Evaluation
    • Evaluation Award
    • Quality Assurance
    • Our Team
  • Publications
    • Annual Report on Evaluation
    • Reflections - Lessons Learned
    • Independent Country Programme Evaluations
    • Thematic Evaluations
    • Global and Regional Programme Evaluations
    • Joint Evaluations
    • National Evaluation Capacities
    • Papers and Articles
    • Evaluation Synthesis
    • Books
    • Evaluations Commissioned by UNDP Programme Units
  • Guidance
    • UNDP Evaluation Guidelines
    • Rating System
    • Evaluation During COVID-19
    • GEF Project Evaluation Guide
    • Evaluation Diagnostic Tool
  • Policy
  • NEC Conference
  • Media Centre
    • Blogs
    • Events
    • Infographics
    • Newsletters
    • Video & Photo Gallery
  • AIDA
  • Evaluation Resource Centre

Independent Evaluation Office

×

Independent Evaluation Office

  • About IEO
    • Mandate
    • Director's Desk
    • Board Decisions
    • Annual Report on Evaluation
    • Evaluation Award
    • Quality Assurance
    • Our Team
  • Publications
    • Annual Report on Evaluation
    • Reflections - Lessons Learned
    • Independent Country Programme Evaluations
    • Thematic Evaluations
    • Global and Regional Programme Evaluations
    • Joint Evaluations
    • National Evaluation Capacities
    • Papers and Articles
    • Evaluation Synthesis
    • Books
    • Evaluations Commissioned by UNDP Programme Units
  • Guidance
    • UNDP Evaluation Guidelines
    • Rating System
    • Evaluation During COVID-19
    • GEF Project Evaluation Guide
    • Evaluation Diagnostic Guidance
  • Policy
  • NEC Conference
  • Media Centre
    • Blogs
    • Events
    • Infographics
    • Newsletters
    • Video & Photo Gallery
  • AIDA
  • Evaluation Resource Centre
  • UNDP around the world
    ×

    Many of UNDP's relationships with countries and territories on the ground exceed 50 years.
    Find details on our successes and ongoing work.

    • Afghanistan
    • Albania
    • Algeria
    • Angola
    • Argentina
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bahrain
    • Bangladesh
    • Barbados
    • Belarus
    • Belize
    • Benin
    • Bhutan
    • Bolivia
    • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • Botswana
    • Brazil
    • Burkina Faso
    • Burundi
    • Cambodia
    • Cameroon
    • Cape Verde
    • Central African Republic
    • Chad
    • Chile
    • China
    • Colombia
    • Comoros
    • Congo (Dem. Republic of)
    • Congo (Republic of)
    • Costa Rica
    • Côte d'Ivoire
    • Croatia
    • Cuba
    • Cyprus
    • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
    • Denmark (Rep. Office)
    • Djibouti
    • Dominican Republic
    • E.U (Rep. Office)
    • Ecuador
    • Egypt
    • El Salvador
    • Equatorial Guinea
    • Eritrea
    • Ethiopia
    • Finland (Rep. Office)
    • Gabon
    • Gambia
    • Geneva (Rep. Office)
    • Georgia
    • Ghana
    • Guatemala
    • Guinea
    • Guinea-Bissau
    • Guyana
    • Haiti
    • Honduras
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Iran
    • Iraq (Republic of)
    • Jamaica
    • Jordan
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kenya
    • Kosovo (as per UNSCR 1244)
    • Kuwait
    • Kyrgyzstan
    • Lao PDR
    • Lebanon
    • Lesotho
    • Liberia
    • Libya
    • Madagascar
    • Malawi
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Mali
    • Mauritania
    • Mauritius & Seychelles
    • Mexico
    • Moldova
    • Mongolia
    • Montenegro
    • Morocco
    • Mozambique
    • Myanmar
    • Namibia
    • Nepal
    • Nicaragua
    • Niger
    • Nigeria
    • Norway (Rep. Office)
    • Pacific Office
    • Pakistan
    • Panama
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Paraguay
    • Peru
    • Philippines
    • Programme of Assistance to the Palestinian People
    • Russian Federation
    • Rwanda
    • Samoa (Multi-country Office)
    • São Tomé and Principe
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Senegal
    • Serbia
    • Sierra Leone
    • Somalia
    • South Africa
    • South Sudan
    • Sri Lanka
    • Sudan
    • Suriname
    • Swaziland
    • Sweden (Rep. Office)
    • Syria
    • Tajikistan
    • Tanzania
    • Thailand
    • The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
    • Timor-Leste
    • Togo
    • Tokyo (Rep. Office)
    • Trinidad and Tobago
    • Tunisia
    • Turkey
    • Turkmenistan
    • Uganda
    • Ukraine
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Uruguay
    • Uzbekistan
    • Venezuela
    • Viet Nam
    • Washington (Rep. Office)
    • Yemen
    • Zambia
    • Zimbabwe
    • Regional Presence
    • Africa
    • Arab States
    • Asia and the Pacific
    • Europe and Central Asia
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • Global Policy Centres
    • Istanbul
    • Nairobi
    • Oslo
    • Rio de Janeiro
    • Seoul
    • Singapore
  • About us
  • Publications
  • News Centre
  • Funding
    • Top contributors
    • Funding channels
    • Funding windows
    • Partners

Home » Synthesis of lessons from Evaluations

Synthesis of lessons from Evaluations

Synthesis of ICPEs of UNDP in Europe and the CIS
Synthesis of lessons from ICPEs of UNDP in Europe and the CIS

Synthesis of Lessons from Independent Country Programme Evaluations of UNDP Programme in Europe and the Commonweatlh of Europe and Independent States

Share This Page

Twitter Feed

Tweets by @UNDP_Evaluation

About IEO

  • Annual Report
  • Mandate

Evaluations

  • Independent Country Programme Evaluations
  • Thematic Evaluations
  • Global and Regional Programme Evaluations
  • Evaluations Commissioned by UNDP Programme Units

Quick links

  • Evaluation Policy
  • Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Results
  • Evaluation Resource Centre

IEO Contact

1 UN Plaza
20th Floor
New York, NY 10017 >

ieo@undp.org

  • Jobs
  • Procurement
  • Legal
  • Transparency
  • Anti-Fraud Hotline
  • Find Us:
.

.