Home » Evaluations » EB Presentation » 2018

Executive Board 2019

Second Regular Session: September 2019

UNDP Revised Evaluation Policy 2019

The revised UNDP evaluation policy (DP/2019/29) as requested in EB Decision 2019/7 is the result of an independent review of the policy. The policy review team set out 11 recommendations concerning UNDP’s evaluation policy principles, evaluation architecture, procedures and quality assurance. The revised evaluation policy takes into effect 8 out of the 11 recommendations.

Annual Session: June 2019

Annual Report on Evaluation 2018

This annual report provides detailed insights into the evaluation activities at UNDP, UNCDF and UNV in 2018. It highlights key achievements, challenges, lessons and presents the future work plan and ways forward.

Evaluation Policy Review

An independent external panel conducted the review of the UNDP Evaluation Policy. The review examined the period from September 2016 to January 2019, taking into consideration contextual and organizational changes that took place since the approval of the 2016 Evaluation Policy by the Executive Board. Findings and recommendations of this review will inform the next revision of the UNDP Evaluation Policy.

First Regular Session: January 2019

Evaluation of UNDP Support to Poverty Reduction in the LDCs

The Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) carried out an ‘Evaluation of the UNDP's contribution to poverty reduction in the Least Developed Countries (LDCs).’ The evaluation is part of the IEO medium-term plan (DP/2018/4) approved by the Executive Board in January 2018. The evaluation assessed the contribution of the country programmes, and global and regional programmes to reducing poverty, across five streams of UNDP support, viz., inclusive growth and employment, local economic development, sustainable livelihoods, early economic revitalization, and MDG/SDG integration. Cross-cutting programmatic principles outlined in the Strategic Plan, viz., gender equality and women’s empowerment (GEWE), and partnerships were assessed. All the LDCs in Africa, Asia and the Pacific, Arab States and Haiti in the Caribbean were covered by the evaluation. The evaluation, and management response, will be presented to the Executive Board for decision at the first regular session in 2019 and is expected to contribute to the development of corporate programme strategies on poverty reduction and sustainable development; and to strengthen UNDP's accountability to global and national development partners, including the Executive Board.

Report of the Independent Evaluation Office on its support to evaluation capacity development

The UNDP Independent Evaluation Office, in addition to its main function – conducting independent thematic and programmatic evaluations – also contributes to capacity development for evaluation within UNDP and beyond, with national partners and the global evaluation community, in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The IEO has developed an overview of this small yet highly relevant component of its work, for Board member information at the 1st Regular Session in 2019. Through this component, the IEO seeks to contribute to three intermediate outcomes through a series of interrelated capacity development activities and interventions: improved quality and relevance of UNDP-led evaluations; national evaluation capacities and systems are strengthened; and, global evaluation culture strengthened. The paper describes support to each of these three strands. Emphasis is given to the second stream, strengthening national evaluation capacities, a key component of which has been the National Evaluation Capacities (NEC) Conference series. 2017 represented a milestone -- with the conclusion of the fifth NEC Conference in Istanbul this past October, each UNDP region had hosted one of the conferences -- prompting the Office to reflect on the future of the series. Planning for the next conference is now beginning. Moving forward into 2019, the IEO will continue to strengthen its capacity development strategy, seeking greater synergies between its various capacity development initiatives, as well as between these and its own evaluative work.