Assessment of Development Results at Country Level |
|
| |
2012 | 2011| 2010| 2009 |2008 | 2007 | 2006 |2005| 2004| 2003| 2002 |
2012 |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals, its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2002 and 2010. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals, its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2002 and 2010. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals, its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2002 and 2010. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals and its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2004 and 2011. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in their continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from their achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals and its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2004 and 2011. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in their continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from their achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals, its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2003 and 2011. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals and its relevance and strategic position within the country during the programme period 2007-2011 (extended to 2012). It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals, its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2002 and 2011. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined the relevance and strategic positioning of UNDP in the Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Niue, Palau, Vanuatu, Tokelau, Tuvalu, Tonga, Kiribati, Nauru, Samoa and the Solomon Islands and its contributions to the countries’ development in the period 2003-2011.
|
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals, its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2002 and 2010. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges. |
 |
The evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to development results during the 2002-2007 and 2008-2012 programme cycles. It focuses on the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of programme activities in achieving intended programme outcomes, as well as the potential sustainability of the results achieved. The ADR also assessed UNDP’s strategic positioning and approaches, drawing general conclusions and recommendations to improve UNDP’s future strategy and approaches have been made. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals, its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2002 and 2010. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges. |
 |
This evaluation examined UNDP’s contributions to national development goals, its relevance and strategic position within the country during the period between 2002 and 2010. It provides a set of forward-looking recommendations, with a view to supporting the country office and its partners in the continuous efforts to improve the country programme by learning from the achievements and challenges.
|
| |
